Problem: Looking at the Michael Elmer case (Davidson, Chapter 3). Is it so extreme and polarizing that it is impossible to see and describe alternative, multiple perspectives, or in what ways can you characterize all the different feelings, ideas, and perceptions that come out in this case, not only from major characters but also minor characters and background participants? Remember, you are trying to demonstrate that you have done the reading and the lesson/reading guide--be specific and analytical.
Explain in detail Michael Elmer case with citations.