Follow up response five part 150 words ea part,
Explain how the speech supports this claim (logos, ethos, and/or pathos). Is the opposing side mentioned? Also, describe the method of argumentation you believe is used in the speech (Toulmin? Rogerian? A mixture of both?). Give citations to back up your points, and create a final works cited citation for this essay.
In your response , Do you agree with his or her analysis of this speech? Why? The ‘why' is key - please post a rich response to your classmate.