Question: A critical care clinical nurse specialist (CNS) led an EBP team to complete a search and appraisal of the evidence on the use of therapeutic honey for burns. A team member brings in an article that presents conclusions that are markedly different from the other studies. What is the possible explanation of why the results are so different? Group of answer choices Consistency: There may have been differences in the research design and interventions that resulted in the varied results Justice: The subjects were not treated fairly and equitably Nonmaleficence: The researchers did not minimize the risks to the subjects Autonomy: The subjects did not have the right to withdraw from the study