Evaluate the assigned readings be sure to include the

Question

This discussion asks you to read and evaluate the assigned readings on corporate ethics. There are four readings including one peer-reviewed journal, two practitioner journals, and one newspaper article. The reason? Multiple perspectives to read and evaluate. NO additional research is required.

Discussion

Evaluate the assigned readings. Be sure to include the following:

Briefly discuss the main points and evidence presented from each article.

What conclusions did the author's reach in their respective articles?

Compare and contrast the findings of the four articles: How are they alike? How are they different?

What conclusions do you reach overall from the four readings?

Your post to this discussion should be a minimum of 250 words in length and incorporate content from the readings. You may also include additional research you have done. Be sure to list your references in proper APA format at the end of your post.

• Edgeman and Eskildsen's 2012 article, "Viral Innovation: Integration via Sustainability & Enterprise Excellence," in Journal of Innovation & Business Best Practices, pages 1-13.

• Greenhouse's May 2, 2013, article, "Some Retailers Rethink Roles In Bangladesh," in The New York Times.

• O'Toole and Vogel's 2011 article, "Two and a Half Cheers for Conscious Capitalism," in California Management Review, volume 53, issue 3, pages 60-76.

• Vallaster, Lindgreen, and Maon's 2012 article, "Strategically Leveraging Corporate Social Responsibility: A Corporate Branding Perspective," in California Management Review, volume 54, issue 3, pages 34-60.

Answer 1

For the topic corporate ethics, write down a paper in approximately 2 pages word file in which you have to address the following questions by following the APA guidelines and including the text citations and references. Q1. Assess the assigned readings on the corporate ethics. Q2. In brief, describe the key points and proof presented from each and every article. Q3. Illustrate what conclusions did the author's reach in their particular articles? Q4. Compare and contrast the findings of the four articles: Explain how they are alike? Illustrate how are they dissimilar? Q5. Write what conclusions do you reach in general from the four readings?