Estimate the amount of goodwill impairment for each company


Financial statement analysis discussion case

Please complete the financial statement analysis case (Case 1 Merck and Johnson & Johnson OR Case 2 Analysis of Goodwill).

Financial Statement Analysis Cases

Case 1: Merck and Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co., Inc. and Johnson & Johnson are two leading producers of healthcare products. Each has considerable assets, and each expends considerable funds each year toward the development of new products. The development of a new healthcare product is often very expensive, and risky. New products frequently must undergo considerable testing before approval for distribution to the public. For example, it took Johnson & Johnson 4 years and $200 million to develop its 1-DAY ACUVUE contact lenses. Below are some basic data compiled from the financial statements of these two companies.

(all dollars in millions)

Johnson & Johnson

Merck

Total assets

$53,317

$42,573

Total revenue

47,348 

22,939 

Net income

8,509  

5,813  

Research and development expense

5,203  

4,010  

Intangible assets

11,842 

2,765  

Instructions

(a) What kinds of intangible assets might a healthcare products company have? Does the composition of these intangibles matter to investors-that is, would it be perceived differently if all of Merck's intangibles were goodwill than if all of its intangibles were patents?

(b) Suppose the president of Merck has come to you for advice. He has noted that by eliminating research and development expenditures the company could have reported $4 billion more in net income. He is frustrated because much of the research never results in a product, or the products take years to develop. He says shareholders are eager for higher returns, so he is considering eliminating research and development expenditures for at least a couple of years. What would you advise?

(c) The notes to Merck's financial statements note that Merck has goodwill of $1.1 billion. Where does recorded goodwill come from? Is it necessarily a good thing to have a lot of goodwill on a company's books?

Case 2: Analysis of Goodwill

As a new intern for the local branch office of a national brokerage firm, you are excited to get an assignment that allows you to use your accounting expertise. Your supervisor provides you with the spreadsheet below, which contains data for the most recent quarter for three companies that the firm has been recommending to its clients as "buys." Each of the companies' returns on assets has outperformed their industry cohorts in the past. But, given recent challenges in their markets, there is concern that the companies may experience operating challenges and lower earnings. (All numbers in millions, except return on assets.)

Company

Fair Value of Company

Book Value (Bet Assets)

Carrying Value of Goodwill

Return on Assets

Sprint Nextel

$36,361

$51,271

$30,718

3.5%

Washington Mutual

11,742

23,941

9,062

2.4

E' Trade Financial

1,639

4,104

2,035

5.6

Instructions

(a) The fair value for each of these companies is lower than the corresponding book value. What implications does this have for each company's future prospects?

(b) To date, none of these companies has recorded goodwill impairments. Your supervisor suspects that they will need to record impairments in the near future, but he is unsure about the goodwill impairment rules. Is it likely that these companies will recognize impairments? Explain.

(c) Estimate the amount of goodwill impairment for each company and prepare the journal entry to record the impairment. For each company, you may assume that the book value less the carrying value of the goodwill approximates the fair value of the company's net assets.

(d) Discuss the effects of your entries in part (c) on your evaluation of these companies based on the return on assets ratio.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Accounting Basics: Estimate the amount of goodwill impairment for each company
Reference No:- TGS02372567

Now Priced at $25 (50% Discount)

Recommended (95%)

Rated (4.7/5)