Third Party Beneficiary. John Palace and Leonard Harlan, who headed Palace-Harlan, Inc., an investment firm, entered into an agreement with the federal government to buy Empire Federal Savings and Loan. Under the agreement, Palace-Harlan was to invest a nominal amount in the bank and arrange for others to invest much more, in exchange for, among other things, a promise that for two years, Empire would not be subject to certain restrictions in federal regulations. The government’s enforcement of other regulations against Empire led to its going out of business. Palace-Harlan, and the other investors filed a suit in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims against the government, alleging breach of contract. The government filed a motion to dismiss all of the plaintiffs except Palace-Harlan, on the ground that the others did not sign the contract between the government and Palace-Harlan. Is the government correct? Should the court dismiss the claims brought by the other investors? Why or why not?