Employee who is accused of federally-owned office equipment


Question: Arthur is a federal employee who is accused of using federally-owned office equipment to make personal profits. Arthur stands to lose his federal pension as a penalty. Arthur demands a hearing be held, giving him the opportunity to produce witnesses and other evidence proving he did not use the equipment for personal purposes and that his pension should not be forfeited. Arthur is demanding which of the following? Group of answer choices enforcement of the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment substantive due process procedural due process. Second Amendment rights eminent domain

 

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Employee who is accused of federally-owned office equipment
Reference No:- TGS03402959

Expected delivery within 24 Hours