Each of the four perspectives has a favored ethical value. Again, with the concept of ethical pluralism, you don't have to choose which value is more important than another—all are important. However, when you can only use one of the values because they are in tension, each lens gives greater weight to a different value. What was the foundational value assigned to your lens? Do you agree or disagree that when you have to choose a path of action, this value tends to be more important to you than some of the other values?