Does this argument make sense for Lady Lovelace's Objection?
1. Thinking requires originality or creativity. (implicit)
2. Both humans and machines are constrained by natural or physical laws. (implicit)
3. Both humans and machines are thinking if they originated something. (implicit)
4. Original contents are surprising. (implicit)
5. If a machine is thinking, then it takes me by surprise.
6. Machines take me by surprise with great frequency
7. So, machines think.