Problem
Looking for a speech (entertainment, political, movie, historical, etc) and analyzing it for structure.
Two major types of structure that we could look for are Toulmin's model (claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, rebuttal) and Rogerian model (understanding, bridging, seeing the value of claims in an opposing view).
Try to find a speech that uses one model or the other. Not every speech may be a perfect example for analysis. Once you find a speech that works, chart out how that structure is used and then assess how well it is used. Does the author of that speech use all parts of the Toulmin model or all aspects of Toulmin argumentation? What effect does this have on how effective it is?
Your response CAN follow a template. For example, the introduction can introduce the speech and note that the Toulmin model is used (and how effectively it is implemented). Then each part (claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, rebuttal) can be identified (or not) and assessed in bullet form before a brief conclusion.