Discuss the below:
Create a 400-600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments.
Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
Part 1
One common point of debate in law is whether laws should be changed based upon the times or circumstances. It has been a consideration since the Founding Fathers created the Constitution.
Your task is to consider this issue, as it relates specifically to two particular laws. The topic up for debate: should the Dodd-Frank Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act be flexible and change based upon the times or circumstances. Read this article and then this information from the SEC on these Acts, and conduct a brief analysis of each, to demonstrate your understanding of both.
Part 2
Based on the first initial of your last name, complete the following:
•Provide an argument for the value in changing these two laws based on times/circumstances.
•Provide an argument against the ability of laws to be modified based on times/ circumstances.