Do you think that the standards set forth in the court cases


Problem

Consider the assertion: "Judges can distinguish between good science/scientific evidence and junk science/scientific evidence to accurately determine evidence admissibility thanks to cases like Frye and Daubert (and the latter's 'progeny,' General Electric and Kumho)."

Do you think that the standards set forth in these court cases are enough to prevent "junk" science from entering the courtroom and being introduced in a trial? Why or why not?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Do you think that the standards set forth in the court cases
Reference No:- TGS03257036

Expected delivery within 24 Hours