Problem: "During the late evening hours of August 27 and the early morning hours of August 28, 2010, Plaintiffs April Goodwin, Tiffany Randolph, and Javon Wash-ington were seated at a table, socializing with friends at Yeakle's Sports Bar and Grill, a small establish-ment in Marion, Indiana. Another patron, Rodney Carter, was seated nearby with his wife. At some point, Carter thought he heard Washington make a derogatory remark about Carter's wife. This angered Carter who produced a handgun and fired at Wash-ington. He struck Washington and accidentally struck Goodwin and Randolph as well. All three shooting victims survived, and Carter later pleaded guilty to three counts of battery with a deadly weapon.Plaintiffs filed a complaint for damages against the Bar, alleging negligence in "failing to provide security for its patrons; ... failing to search Rodney Carter for weapons; ... and failing to warn Plain-tiffs that Rodney Carter was armed and dangerous." After discovery, the Bar moved for summary judgment, arguing Carter's criminal acts were unforesee-able and, thus, the Bar had no duty to anticipate and take steps to prevent Carter's conduct. After a hearing, the trial court agreed and entered summary judgment in the Bar's favor. Do you think this motion for summary judgment was subsequently upheld? Why or why not?"