Discuss the pros and cons of mandatory sentences do

Question

Write a minimum of a 700-word response to the following questions:

Part 1 - Discuss the pros and cons of mandatory sentences. Do mandatory sentences remove discretion from the sentencing judge and vest discretion in the prosecutor, who may elect to charge a defendant with a lesser offense to avoid imposition of a mandatory sentence?

Part 2 - In a substantial number of criminal appeals, some state appellate courts routinely issue decisions merely stating "Judgment Affirmed." When an appellate court rejects a defendant's issues on appeal, should it be required to issue an opinion justifying its decision? In discussing this issue, consider whether such a requirement would require greatly increasing the number of judges and support staff and the additional costs thereof, as well as detract from the court's ability to direct its efforts to writing opinions on novel questions of law.
Format your response consistent with APA guidelines.

Answer 1

For the following questions, provide answer to a minimum of around 700 words. Q1. Describe the pros and cons of the mandatory sentences. Do mandatory sentences eradicate discretion from the sentencing judge and vest discretion in the prosecutor, who might elect to charge a defendant by a lesser offense to avoid burden of a mandatory sentence? Q2. In a considerable number of criminal appeals, a few state appellate courts routinely issue decisions just stating ‘Judgment Affirmed’. If an appellate court refuses a defendant's issues on appeal, must it be needed to issue an opinion explaining its decision? In describing this issue, consider whether such a need would require greatly increasing the number of judges and support staff and the extra costs thereof, and also detract from the court's capability to direct its efforts to writing opinions on the new questions of law. Need paper in Times New Roman, single spaced and must meet APA guideline.