Assignment:
PART A. 75 Words
As a patrol officer, you are only doing your job when you stop a car for running a red light. Unfortunately, the driver of the car happens to be the mayor. You give her a ticket anyway, but the next morning you get called into the captain's office and told in no uncertain terms that you screwed up, for there is an informal policy extending "courtesy" to city politicians. Several nights later, you observe the mayor's car weaving erratically across lanes and speeding. What would you do? What if the driver were a fellow police officer? What if it were a high school friend?
Share the moral rule(s) and ethical system that corresponds with your decision.
PART B. 2 to 3 Pages
Code of Conduct and Ethics Policy
The Tidewater Police Department is a small rural department that consists of 22 police officers, 4 detectives, a criminal intelligence analyst and 3 secretaries. The mayor just hired you as Chief of the department. About half of the officers have 20+ years of experience and the other half have less than 3 years of experience. You learn that there have been 4 civil cases filed against the department for police officer misconduct within the last year.
Write a 2 to 3 page, APA style paper addressing the issues of Code of Conduct and Ethics Policies for Police Departments. Include in the body of the paper a Code of Conduct and Ethics Policy for the Tidewater Police Department. Please include 2 to 3 references.
PART C. 75 Words
Please review this Opinion Article that discusses whether a person who leaves their child in a car is guilty of a crime (most state's do define this as a negligent act) discuss why you do or do not feel it is a crime. Would it require specific intent? What would be the elements necessary to satisfy qualifying as a crime?
PART D. 2 Pages
Shoulder Tap Crime
Most states make it a crime to purchase alcohol for a minor, sometimes called the shoulder tap crime, based on the typical manner a request by a minor for an adult to buy alcohol occurs. These crimes generally do not require proof that the defendant knew the person was underage.
• Should the same strict liability apply to a host of a party that is attended by both adults and minors, where alcohol at the private party is furnished to both?
• Should a host be able to offer evidence that he reasonably believed the minor was old enough to drink?
• Would it help your case if the jurisdiction made such a defense available to bars and liquor stores that required buyers to provide proof of age?
Use the following case to help guide your analysis:
https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/calcrim/2900/2964.html