Assignment:
Question 1 - Compare and contrast the assumptions associated with the philosophies of deterrence and rehabilitation.
Question 2 - Compare and contrast the assumptions associated with the philosophies of retribution and incapacitation.
Question 3 - Discuss the criticisms associated with each of the 4 philosophies. Then discuss which philosophy or rather purpose/justification of punishment you believe is superior and why?
Question 4 - What are the core arguments underlying legal and philosophical debates on the definition/meaning of punishment and why are they important to justice policy and practice? In other words, what are the practical implications of these debates for individuals, offenders, and society; how have these debates impacted the real world?