Problem: Hospers ends his article by providing several problems for the Ethical Relativist. What is the point of the objection he is making in part 'd.'?
1. That there is no such thing as moral improvement
2. That Ethical Relativism gives us incentive to strive to improve our society
3. That there is no point in trying to improve your society
4. That Ethical Relativism cannot give a coherent account of social improvement; if Ethical Relativism is true, societies do not morally get better