Discuss santosky v. kramer case in the state of florida


Problem: In Santosky v. Kramer case In the state of Florida, finding a child dependent requires a preponderance of the evidence standard. Is this standard constitutional? John is voluntarily turned over to the custody of the state of Florida. John is autistic. He is placed in a foster home with five (5) other children. John's autism requires specialized care which he is not receiving. John's autism gets worse and he is forced to be institutionalized. A. If you were John's attorney, what constitutional arguments would you make? B. If you were the attorney for the state of Florida, what arguments would you make? Please include factors of liberty interest and state protection

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Discuss santosky v. kramer case in the state of florida
Reference No:- TGS03382310

Expected delivery within 24 Hours