Discuss the following:
Summary of caseAn internal usability team wanted to perform a usability test on a web site using half internaland half external participants. Would the consent form designed for external users also beused for the internals? Some members of the usability team argued that the terms ofemployment were sufficient to require internals participate. Others argued that the purposeof ‘consent' was to ensure that participants understood why they had been asked, what wasgoing to happen, what data would be collected, how it would be used and that they were freeto leave any time. Given that the company had paid for usability testing, and given that theemployees had agreed to work for the company for payment, is the employee free to leave?ACS Code of Professional Conduct values and relevant clauses of the Code of Professional Conduct1.2.1 Public Interesta) identify those potentially impacted by your work and explicitly consider their interests;1.2.2 Quality of Lifea) recognise, in your work, the role that ICT can play to enhance the quality of life of people,particularly the disadvantaged or those with disabilities;1.2.3 Honestye) qualify professional opinions which you know are based on limited knowledge or experience;1.2.4 Competenceg) respect, and seek when necessary, the professional expertise of colleagues in their areas ofcompetence.1.2.6 Professionalisma) take a calm, objective, informed and knowledgeable stance on your professional work,complementing your enthusiasm and engagement in it; question to do
You are need to complete the below :
Step 1.Construct a diagram using Rationaleto map the arguments about a moral claim that you have identified in the article/case study:
• Include all supporting and objecting claims. These claims should include facts collated from your own research, classical ethical theories that support or object to the claim and ACS codes that are in conflict with the claim
• You are expected to 'finish off' the case's arguments, turning it into a valid and properly structured argument.
• You should use information from the article/case study, other sources discovered during your research, and your own reasoned arguments. A balanced and impartial argument is the objective.
• All arguments should obey the Golden Rule, Rabbits Rule, Holding Hands Rule and the Pyramid Rule.
• The main claim/conclusion must be an ethical claim. the diagram must be done through the sitehttps://www.rationaleonline.com/
Step2.Create an essay,which maps closely to the Rationale diagram that you constructed in Step 1.
• Theword limitfor the essay is 1,300 words ± 10%. Headings, citations and references do not count towards the word limit, but quotations do.
• All the claims shown on the Rationale diagram must appear in the essay, and all claims made in the essay must appear on the Rationale diagram. The essay must present all the detailed information that the Rationale diagram cannot.
• Remember to analyse the article/case study from the perspective of at least two different classical ethical theories and present well reasoned arguments for your assessments and recommendations.
Step 3.Write an overall conclusionthat justifies your recommendations made in your essay.
Step 4. Reference list
•You must Include aReferencelist at the end of your work, in the correct APA referencing style, corresponding to in-text citations.
• You should include at leastfive (5)qualityreferences from different sources. Please note that these five references are in addition to those provided to you through this subject (for example, you still must reference, Tavani, the ACS code, the Interact subject lecture notes etcBUTthese referencescannotbe used as one of your five quality references from different sources).
• Only use references that have been cited in the body of your assignment and ones that support what you have presented in your assignment.