Problem: A state law reads as follows, "Any child that is abused by a parent shall have the right to testify via closed-circuit television. The child shall be placed under oath. The child shall be placed in a separate room, by themselves, and shall be allowed to read from a prepared statement. The attorneys, the defendant, the judge and the jury shall all remain in the courtroom. All parties in the courtroom, including the jury, will be able to see the child read the prepared statement. Once the child is done reading the prepared statement, the child shall be excused as a witness." Does this law violate the confrontation clause of the 6th amendment? Based on Marilyn vs Greig what are the factors, compared and contrast? hypothetically explain. According to the 6th Amendment is a law has been violated? Based on koi vs coy ? What are the 4 things they can not violate?