Discuss about circumstantial evidence compared with direct


Problem:

Alex Murdaugh Double Murder Trial and Conviction. It is a criminal prosecution of a very prominent South Carolina Lawyer named Alex Murdaugh.His Family has, for generations, run the largest most prestigious lawfirm in his hometown. He now stands accused of a double murder of his wife Maggie and his son Paul. Then do online research to find out what evidence the prosecution used to convict the defendant Alex Murdaugh on ALL counts/charges. Also examine the defense evidence, what kind of evidence did they produce to counter the charges. Think about circumstantial evidence compared with direct evidence. What direct evidence was offered, what circumstantial evidence was offered. How did the prosecution achieve this result of guilty on all counts. Finally, was it a good idea to have the accused, the defendant, testify?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Discuss about circumstantial evidence compared with direct
Reference No:- TGS03348695

Expected delivery within 24 Hours