Problem: This controversial topic about electric cars is related to ecology subject. You argued that the government should subsidize electric cars because gas vehicles produce unhealthy carbon emissions, creating a big change in the global climate. To prove this provides an analysis of your topic from the theme of problematizing the intuitive idea that Nature does not provide everything to support life. How might people look at your case using the intuitive idea that NATURE DOES NOT PROVIDE? Knowing what you know now about that thinking, how does that change your thinking about your topic?