Problem:
Phillips, J. (2010) differentiates between two types of risk events: secondary risk event is when a risk response creates a whole new risk event, and residual risks are usually tiny risk events that are created as the result of a risk event.
Do you think that secondary risks should be given more attention?
From my point of view, I believe that the quantity of risk events (secondary or residual) is a very important factor that should be accounted for. So it's not only the quality of type of the risk event, it's also the quantity of risk events.
What do you think?
Reference:
Phillips, J. (2010) PMP Project Management Professional Lab Manual. New York: McGraw-Hill/Osborne.