Problem: After reading Soham Patil's argument about online vs. in-person classes, answer the following questions:
1. Did Patil's argument convince you? If so, please explain what points Patil made that convinced you. If you are not convinced, explain how your experience challenges Patil's claims.
2. If you could have given Statsky advice in a peer review, what would you have advised him to change in order to improve the effectiveness of his argument?
3. At the end of his argument, Patil seems to shift gears and acknowledges the advantages of online classes. Do you think this conclusion helps or hurts his argument? Explain.