Describe the economic outcome of single-price monopoly


Questions:

Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four double-spaced pages; refer to the "Assignment Format" page located on the Course Home page for specific format requirements.

Part A

1. Why is the money multiplier in the United States smaller than the inverse of the required reserve ratio? Provide one reason.

2. Explain why depositing cash into a checking account does not change the money supply. Provide one supporting fact.

3. Explain why the money supply does not change when one individual writes a check to another. Provide one supporting fact.

Part B

1. Describe one reason why the flexibility of wages and prices tend to favor the Keynesian economic view in the short run and one reason why the flexibility of wages and prices tend to favor the classical economic view in the long run.

2. Refer the figure below and explain what happens in each graph (A, B, and C) when an economy is moving from a recession (point a) back to full employment.

Question 2

Part A

Imagine that it is the year 2199. Technology has progressed at an incredible pace. The latest discovery is the plutonium engine, which is capable of converting plutonium, a by-product of nuclear fission, into fuel to power the nuclear reactors in our new form of transportation, the rocket-car. However, because the firm that invented the engine, the Futures Unlimited Corporation, already has a government license to control and distribute the quantity of this certain isotope of plutonium on the market, it is now conceivably in charge of a monopoly on plutonium-fueled transportation.

1. Describe the economic outcome of this single-price monopoly in terms of profit. Provide one supporting fact to support your response.

2. Describe one way that the Futures Unlimited Corporation makes output and price decisions.

Part B

1. Would consumers benefit more from a tariff or a quota on imports? Provide one supporting fact to support your response.

2. Consider the following weekly production possibilities of gloves and hats in Panama and Russia:

Russia Panama

Gloves 20 180

Hats 80 90

a. What is each country's opportunity cost of producing gloves and hats?

b. If the countries could, should they trade? Provide one supporting fact to support your position.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Microeconomics: Describe the economic outcome of single-price monopoly
Reference No:- TGS01846987

Expected delivery within 24 Hours