Describe how the defendant would rebut amandas

Question

Assignment: Invitee or Licensee-

Based upon the discussion in Knorpp vs. Hale at pp. 480-483 in the text, and at 981 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. App. 1998.)

Amanda toured a private home as a participant in a garden club tour of homes, and paid $25 to the garden club but nothing to the homeowner. Amanda tripped and fell down the steps to the deck, leading to the garden, though there was no obvious defect in the steps.

Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:

1. Suggest whether it would be more advantageous to Amanda to be classified in her negligence lawsuit as a licensee or as an invitee. Provide a rationale for your suggestion.

2. Describe how the defendant would rebut Amanda's classification as either a licensee or as an invitee.

3. Describe the duties of care that a landowner owes to both licensees and invitees.

4. Identify which level of care is higher for the owner or occupiers of land.

Answer 1

There as some factors which is illustrate to Invitee or Licensee- Based upon the discussion in Knorpp vs. Hale at pp. 480-483 in the text, and at 981 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. App. 1998.) Amanda toured a private home as a contributor in a garden club tour of homes, and paid $25 to the garden club but nothing to the homeowner. Amanda tripped and fell down the steps to the deck, leading to the garden, though there was no clear imperfection in the steps. Inscribe a one to three (1-3) page paper in that you: 1. Recommend whether it would be more beneficial to Amanda to be classified in her negligence lawsuit as a licensee or as an invitee. Give a rationale for your proposal. 2. Explain how the defendant would rebut Amanda's classification as either a licensee or as an invitee. 3. Illustrate the duties of care that a landowner owes to together licensees and invitees. 4. Recognize which level of care is higher for the owner or occupiers of land.