Problem:
What does In criminal and civil court cases, eye-witness testimonies from human memory often falsely accuse/convict the defendant whether they do this on purpose or not. "The fact that memories are so plastic and changeable, if a memory can be introduced, then that becomes a serious issue and a serious aspect of an investigation. Even if somebody is telling the truth, it may be they're telling the truth about a false memory - about something that didn't happen" (Underdown 2003). If the eye-witness is asked about conversations that were had, they may have a false memory of everything that was said. In the same way, they may misinterpret the events that occurred. There is so much grey area with human memories, that things may process better in different people's minds. Some people have better memories than others, that can present an issue if one remembers the event differently than the other. If the witness has anxiety, being in a court room full of people and the judge. It can trigger them becoming anxious and that can play into them not being able to recall what happened in their memory accurately "The stress response sheds light on how repeated anxiety can