Problem: An indisputably disabled employee requests that her employer put her on part-time status. The employer denies the request because it does not permit any employee to work part-time because of the 24/7 nature of its business. The plaintiff insists that the company's failure to make this accommodation violates the ADA because providing part-time work schedules is contained in the definition of "reasonable accommodation" in §101(9) of the ADA. The defendant rejects this argument. Who is correct? Group of answer choices the plaintiff because the statute defines part-time rescheduling as reasonable as a matter of law the defendant if it can establish this would impose an undue hardship upon it the plaintiff because this is the only effective way of accommodating her disability the defendant because offering part-time employment would impose an undue hardship upon any company