Pete, the owner of Quality Orchards, contracts to sell fruit to Ripe Produce, Inc. When Pete refuses to perform, Ripe Produce files a suit to enforce the contract. If Pete and Ripe Produce are in a state that does not recognize the doctrine of unconscionability, to defend successfully against enforcement of the contract on similar grounds, Pete might rely on traditional notions of
a. fraud.
b. materiality.
c. mistake.
d. unconscionability.