Consider the use of deductive thinking with a syllogism in framing an argument.
Compare the following:
Major Premise: The Constitution guarantees all US citizens the right to vote.
Minor Premise: Women are US citizens.
Conclusion: Therefore, women have the right to vote.
Major Premise: Cardiovascular exercise improves eyesight.
Minor Premise: Jogging is a form of cardiovascular exercise.
Conclusion: Therefore, jogging improves eyesight.
Will the listeners to the above arguments accept each conclusion? Describe with either the above scenarios or your own scenario, the impact syllogisms/deductive thinking have on building an argument.