Consequences of no longer accessing the resources


Assignment Task:

By choosing one program over another, some individuals may suffer the consequences of no longer accessing those resources. Additionally, justice in ethical principles is also relevant in this situation. Justice revolves around fairness and equity in allocating healthcare resources (Gillon, 1994). The transparency principle is also relevant. The principal highlights that all decisions should be as clear as possible, and always involving stakeholders. Since the primary stakeholders will be the ones most impacted by the consequences of cutting a program, they must have the opportunity to be a part of and understand the decision-making process. What approach might the decision-maker take to respond to this issue using the applicable ethical principles? Given the information provided, if you don't feel that you can suggest an approach, say so and indicate what further information would be needed to make this decision. Given the ethical principles outlined, the decision-makers must carefully weigh the scale of potential consequences of removing each program. They must conclude which group faces the most significant health disparities and keep whichever program aids the most vulnerable population. This could be done through data collection to determine which populations experience the largest health inequities. However, more information regarding the success of each program is also needed to decide which program stays. Want Professional Help?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Consequences of no longer accessing the resources
Reference No:- TGS03447057

Expected delivery within 24 Hours