Cities have the right of eminent domain, which is the right to take privately owned property for a public use if the owner of that property is paid fair value for the property. Over the years, what constitutes "public use" has become a problem. At first, public use meant taking property and using it to build schools or roads or fire stations. More recently, public use has come to include situations where a city uses eminent domain to take private property and then sells that property to some other private party who will use the property for a new and better use. What is the problem with that view of "public use"? Do you agree or disagree a cities should use that right to make the city better?