Question: Charles of the Ritz sold a cream that the company claimed would restore youth to the skin, regardless of skin condition or the age of the user. The FTC ordered the company to stop the advertising, claiming it was misleading. The company argued that it wasn't misleading because "no straight-thinking person could believe that the cream would actually rejuvenate skin. "Is the company correct? (Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. FTC, 143 F.2d 676)