Case-reich vs simpson gumpertz and heger


Case Problem:

Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) hired Francis Harvey & Sons as a general contractor. SGH, an engineering firm, was hired to do certain structural engineering services in connection with the project. After a Harvey employee expressed concern to SGH via a telephone call about a potentially dangerous structural defect in the concrete flooring, he was told to continue his work. Later, the flooring collapsed and five workers were hurt. No SGH employees were working at the worksite. After a complaint was filed against SGH, SGH defended, claiming that the worksite was not a “place of employment” of the structural engineering firm and, consequently, OSHA did not apply. Do you agree? [ Reich v. Simpson, Gumpertz & Heger, Inc., 3 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1993).]

Your answer must be typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format and also include  references.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Case-reich vs simpson gumpertz and heger
Reference No:- TGS01978393

Expected delivery within 24 Hours