Case-otiz vs cvs caremark corporation


Assignment:U.S. Diversity Law and Organizational Compliance

In the United States, companies of all sizes, especially those with more than 15 employees, must adhere to nondiscrimination practices. Even if the company is so small that some of Title VII doesn't apply, it is incumbent upon the manager to be familiar with federal antidiscrimination laws, including those relevant to gender, race and ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, age, and disabilities.

Instructions:

Research and evaluate this case

Otiz v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al. (2013)

In a well-written paper, answer the below about the case:

1. Describe the nature of the case. Describe the parties involved and provide a summary of the facts in the case.

2. Identify which of the antidiscrimination laws was violated in the case, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, ADEA, EPA, IRCA, ADA, or GINA.

3. Evaluate the seriousness and scope of the discrimination.

4. What could have been done to prevent the discriminatory practices in the first place? Provide specific action steps you would recommend.

5. Explain the relevant law in light of its historical context and why it was enacted. How does the law protect the offended workers in this case?

Requirements:

Response should include an introduction and a conclusion and should be 3 to 4 pages long, not including the required title and reference pages.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Case Study: Case-otiz vs cvs caremark corporation
Reference No:- TGS01876685

Now Priced at $50 (50% Discount)

Recommended (93%)

Rated (4.5/5)