Select a high profile criminal defendant and do a bit of research on that individual. Share a brief summary of the facts and the criminal proceedings.Assume you were required to represent the individual, access the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments you would or could make.Could your client "beat the wrap" by pleading insanity, slanting their testimony at your urging or exploiting legal loopholes such as the exclusionary rule. How realistic do you think such arguments would be?