Question: Solomon, Posner's critiques tend to stem from the assumption pervasive in a lot of international law literature that international law itself is a powerful force/tool for prompting non-compliant governments to comply. He tends to think that this assumption is wrong, and that its pervasiveness in international law literature has lead to the construction of faulty international thinking and solutions for big HR problems. What do you think...is he right? I encourage everyone to join this conversation!