As noted in the syllabus the reading for this module is

Question

The following is the professor's overview to module 2 - Labor Studies Course:

As noted in the syllabus, the reading for this module is Chapter 2 of Ehrenreich's book.  You also need to view the video "30 Days -- Getting by on Minimum Wage" with Morgan Spurlock. 

One thing to note in this module is how the experience of Morgan Spurlock and his fiance Alex compares to the experience of Ehrenreich.  As you watch the video, pay close attention to the ways that their experience is like Ehrenreich's, and the ways that it differs.  We will be discussing this on the discussion board for this module. 

Once again, the question of "testing" low-wage job applicants (including urine tests) comes up.  At this point in the reading, Ehrenreich states what she thinks is the real purpose of these tests.  Since we discussed this last week, has your perspective changed any after reading her analysis of such testing?  Any way you look at it, such testing tells us something important about our society: either our society is composed of many low-wage workers who are untrustworthy, prone to theft, and likely drug abusers, or employers use these devices to maintain control and to intimidate those at the bottom rungs of our economic order.  On the discussion board, I'll once again be asking you to weigh in on this question. 

In addition to the usual impossibility of finding affordable housing, Ehrenreich brings in racial (and also to some degree, gender) issues in this particular reading.  She chose to go to Maine because of how "white" it is.  Having a smaller population of African Americans and Hispanics than her home state of Florida, she finds that racial and ethnic distinctions are less used in Maine to demarcate the lowest jobs and occupations.  She also notes at one point, when she is being ignored as if "invisible" at the counter of a diner while ordering iced tea, that she might just be getting some sense of what it is like to be black in America.  Thus, she raises in several ways the intersection between racial/ethnic divisions and class distinctions in our society.  On the discussion board I'll be asking you to meditate on these issues she encounters. 

This particular reading also addresses issues about how low-wage workers are seen or perceived by others.  As a cleaning maid, she finds that some homeowners seem to enjoy seeing a cleaning lady on her knees, set up hidden cameras to "catch" any misdeeds such as stealing, and seem totally oblivious to the humanity of those who clean up after them.  She also finds that, unlike waitressing, being a cleaning lady relegates one to the lowest of the low in the eyes of others, even in the eyes of other low-wage workers themselves.  "They think we're stupid" is a comment that pretty well sums it up.  Are such attitudes justified or not?  What does this tell us about our society?

Ehrenreich also wants to debunk the notion that there is plenty of assistance available (at convenient times and ways) for those in need.  She finds it practically impossible to obtain food assistance during any reasonable hours, and what she does get is unhealthy and somewhat impossible to consume in her circumstances.  This again addresses a controversial question:  does the U.S. give ample (many would say way too much) assistance to those at the bottom of the economic ladder?  It is widely believed that our society is too generous -- the opposite of Ehrenreich's experience or belief. 

And finally, this reading addresses the toll that is taken on one's self-image when you are treated as "nothing" or "invisible" or at minimum as untrustworthy and unworthy.  She finds her fellow cleaning maids to be dependent on and seeking approval from a "boss" that Ehrenreich finds loathsome, and mostly devoid of any sense that they deserved better.  To Ehrenreich, who would love to see some "fight back" from her fellow workers, this is dispiriting. The following are the questions to answer to the discussion board for this second module:

1. 1. Low-wage experience of Spurlock vs. Ehrenreich      
2. • Morgan Spurlock and his fiance Alex have an experience with low-wage work that is in many ways like that of Barbara Ehrenreich; yet in some ways it is different.  Please discuss the ways that it is alike, and the ways that it is different.  Whatadditionalissues and concerns, beyond those of Ehrenreich, does Spurlock's video raise?  What are some additional lessons we learn from this video?     
3. 2. Testing, once again      
4. • Ehrenreich has more to say about "personality" tests and urine tests for low-wage workers in this reading. After reading her "take" on it, do you have any additional thoughts beyond what you posted last week? How do you react to Ehrenreich's position? Agree? Disagree? Why or why not? (If you've already addressed these on the discussion of Module 1, you might not need to add much on this topic here; but if not, please continue the discussion).    
5. 3. Racial and ethnic (& gender) issues and low-wage work      
6. • In this reading, Ehrenreich brings in racial and ethnic and gender issues. She goes to a "mostly white" state to do low-wage work. She reflects that she might be getting a little bit of what it feels like to be black in America when she is treated as "invisible" and a "nobody." She also finds women treated poorly by (mostly male) supervisors. From all this, it should be apparent that Ehrenreich believes we still have racial, ethnic, and gender discrimination of great significance in the U.S.A. Many commentators now argue that we are a post-racial society; that any significant discrimination is now entirely a thing of the past. Who is more right, Ehrenreich, or these commentators? What is the evidence for your position, whatever it is?    
7. 4. Perceptions and treatment of low-wage workers and self-image      
8. • While working as a cleaning lady, Ehrenreich repeatedly finds herself being viewed and treated as basically worthless, untrustworthy, and invisible. She also finds that such treatment affects the self image of her co workers, who come to expect nothing much from life, harboring no resentments about the vast inequality between their "station in life" and that of the owner of their company. In discussion postings, please react to this across different dimensions: is she accurate and truthful in her account? Are the perceptions of house cleaners and other low wage people justified? Should they be more assertive and rebellious, or is their accommodation to their situation the best way to respond? Whatever you post, be sure to argue for your position.

NOTE: Please answer to the four questions to the discussion forum of this second module of the course.  This discussion forum should be two pages in length.