Argue whether you think it is better to theorize about justice starting from existing social conditions (e.g. existing conditions of poverty, existing conditions of oppression, etc.) or whether you think it is better to start from ideal conditions (as Rawls does). By “argue,” I mean you should present at least one developed reason as to why you think one is better than the other.
Please give me a good theory of why one is better than the other.
I offered alot of pionts for great explanation