Assignment 1: The jury in this case decided that Liebeck (the burn victim) was 20% responsible for her own injuries. How would the responsibility of McDonald's be viewed under utiltarianism, Kant's theory, and libertarianism? After considering these theories, what allocation of responsibility between the company and the victim do you think would have been fair? (Give the percentages you think would be fair, and mention the application of the theories in your answer.)
Note: William H Shaw 9e chapter 6