Acting within scope of employment


Assignment:

Lanham and Clark, members of a limited liability company (LLC) contracted with Westec for engineering services for a restaurant the LLC was constructing. Westec did not know it was dealing with an LLC and this was not disclosed to it. When the work was completed, Westic submitted a bill, was not paid, and sued Lanham and Clark. Are they liable? (Eater, Waste & Land, Inc., dba Westec v. Lanham, 955 P. 2d 997). 8. Lewis, employed by Roselle Toyota, was driving a company car on a purely personal errand when he collided with another car owned by Taylor. The injured occupants of the Taylor car sued both Lewis and Roselle, claiming negligence. Roseville claimed it was not liable for the injuries because Lewis was not acting within the scope of his employment. Is Roseville correct? (Taylor v. Roseville Toyota Inc., 138 Cal. App. 4th 994)

Your answer must be typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format and also include references.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Acting within scope of employment
Reference No:- TGS01983615

Expected delivery within 24 Hours