Question 1. In the article "War and Massacre," Thomas Nagel argues that moral absolutism
- is consistent with the principles of utilitarianism
- can be used to justify genocide
- is primarily concerned with what a person is doing
- is primarily concerned with the outcome of a person's actions
Question 2. According to Thomas Nagel's article, "War and Massacre," the absolutist position that creates no problems of interpretation is
- rule utilitarianism
- act utilitarianism
- pacifism
- humanitarian intervention
Question 3. In Kant Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, the maxim of an act is:
- the policy or principle that you would be following if you did it.
- the expected overall utility resulting from the action.
- the moral rule that an act either respects or violates .
- all of the above.
Question 4. Thomas Nagel argues that all rules of engagement should be governed by the utilitarian principle that
- any means can be justified if it leads to a worthy end
- the greatest good can justify targeting noncombatants
- we are always justified in attacking the tyranny of the majority
- none of the above
Question 5. According to the video, "Religion, War, and Violence," for a war to be considered just, it must
- be aimed at repelling aggression
- have a strong probability of success
- must be only used as a last resort
- all of the above
Question 6. According to Nagel, which of the following may be permitted by absolutism, at least in some circumstances?
- Intentionally killing an innocent person
- Doing something that brings about an innocent person's death
- Dropping a nuclear bomb on an enemy city
- Torturing an innocent person
Question 7. According to Nagel, to which of the following groups of people is hostility most appropriately aimed?
- Innocents
- Civilians
- Combatants
- Non-combatants
Question 8. Jeremy Waldron argues that the current use of drone warfare is unethical because
- it is conducted by unlawful combatants such as CIA personnel who are not subject to military ethics
- it is conducted by individuals who are thousands of miles removed from targets
- it may result in unintended civilian casualties
- all of the above
Question 9. Nagel's argument that hostility or aggression should be directed at its true object means that which of the following would probably not be permissible?
- Torturing a prisoner to get the names of his confederates.
- Attacking an enemy country's agricultural system.
- Bombing major cultural centers.
- All of the above.
Question 10. According to Kant, the moral worth of an action:
- lies in its conformity to the moral law.
- lies in the value of the expected result.
- lies in its conformity to God's commands.
- lies in its usefulness to society.
Question 11. According to the video "Religion, War, and Violence," Just War Theory asserts that military intervention
- can be seen as an act of altruism
- must always have an altruistic component
- must be primarily an act of altruism
- must never have an altruistic component
Question 12. In the article "War and Massacre," Thomas Nagel argues that utilitarianism
- is primarily concerned with what should happen
- is primary concerned with what will happen
- is primarily concerned with theory over practice
- is primarily concerned with universal justice
Question 13. Reason is a faculty that we have that:
- is only good if it succeeds in satisfying our desires.
- is the driving principle of a good will.
- is the fundamental ground of human dignity.
- both B and C
Question 14. Kant explains that respect for a person is:
- the recognition of the worth of the person's potential contribution to society.
- dependent upon whether the person respects others.
- both A and B
- none of the above.
Question 15. According to the video "Religion, War, and Violence," proponents of Just War Theory agree that without the restraints of Just War Theory
- the violence and aggression of war would be worse
- humanitarian intervention would be more successful
- prisoners and noncombatants would have greater equality
- none of the above
Question 16. Kant claims that a good will is:
- something that can only be called good with qualification.
- the only thing that can be called good without qualification.
- that which makes qualified goods like character traits morally good.
- both B and C.
Question 17. Kant argues that when I find someone in need:
- I should give whatever spare resources I have unless it makes me worse off than the person I'm trying to help.
- I should consider a world in which no one helped me when I was in need, recognize that I could never will such a world, and help them in the best way that I can.
- I should sympathize with them, but recognize that the world is better off overall if we each only look after our own interests.
- I should remember that as autonomous beings they are responsible for their own situation, and thus that I have no responsibility to help them out.
Question 18. In the video "Drones Are Not Ethical and Effective," Jeremy Waldron argues that drones are not ethical because their use involves
- total transparency and accountability
- the assurance that only combatants will be targeted
- the maintenance of a secret death list by government authorities
- all of the above
Question 19. Nagel argues that the atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just like what other kind of action, just on a larger scale?
- Killing the wife and child of someone attacking you in order to distract him from his attack.
- Bombing a munitions factory and killing some of the civilian workers inside.
- Firing at an enemy soldier and hitting an innocent bystander with a stray bullet.
- Bombing a convoy of enemy soldiers.
Question 20. According to Kant, persons:
- are rational beings.
- must always be regarded as an end.
- have absolute value.
- all of the above.