(a) Some philosophers think that whether the killing of an innocent person in a war is permissible depends in part on whether the killing was intended. If it was, they say, then the killing is wrong. If it was not intended, they say, the killing may be permissible. What objections are there to this view?
?(b) According to others, the killing of innocent people in a war is prime face morally wrong if it treats them as mere objects. How could it treat them as mere objects? One can avoid treating them as mere objects if certain conditions are met. What are the conditions?