A computer programmer has been arraigned for a computer crime. She is suspected of having accessed system files on a public Web server. The programmer's attorney argues that his client was only trying to determine if the website was secure and that no harm was done to the Web server or its system files. The programmer's attorney also argues that it is possible that the log files that show that his client accessed system files were tampered with. The attorney claims that the Web server was made accessible to the public anyway so that there was no violation of the law and that the arraignment against her client should be thrown out. You're the judge. What is your analysis of these arguments?