The following information was recorded for a range of DIY items.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fdbc/3fdbc2bd60e418448a7a7f588f83f4aadfccc6cf" alt=""
a. Construct a simple price index for item Y using Year 0 as the base year.
b. Determine the simple aggregate price index using Year 0 as the base year.
c. Determine the price relatives index using Year 0 as the base year.
d. Calculate the Laspeyres price index using Year 0 as the base year.
e. Calculate the Paasche price index using Year 0 as the base year.
f. Calculate the Laspeyres quantity index using Year 0 as the base year. Note: here we wish to keep prices fixed, and thus the appropriate formula is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d78/71d78f7b1be07b3557388729adc4a4976c92760c" alt=""
g. Calculate the Paasche quantity index using Year 0 as the base year. Note: here we are using the current year prices as the fixed weights, and thus the appropriate formula is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e0d/f4e0d594f29ef8f8447386c7224f8388e552405e" alt=""
h. Why do the Laspeyres and Paasche indices give such different answers for Year 2 in Parts (d) to (g)?