1) Using duty-based ethical principles, what facts or circumstances in this case would lead Moseley to disclose Herzog's behavior?
2) Using outcome-based ethical principles, what issues would Moseley have to analyze in making the decision to report Herzog's behavior? What would be the risks to Moseley? The benefits?
3) Under the Business Process PragmatismTM steps, what alternatives might Moseley have had in this situation?
4) Regardless of who wins this case at trial, in performing Step 5 (Evaluation) of the Business Process PragmatismTM procedure, what changes should the company take with regard to the complaint process?