This question is for a Philosophy class (300 words minimum, cited your sources)
Consider the following argument:
1) If there is no good evidence for belief in Santa, then you shouldn't believe in Santa.
2) There is no good evidence for belief in Santa.
Therefore, 3) You shouldn't believe in Santa.
Do you think this is a sound argument? If not, why not? Where does the argument go wrong? If so, do you think the same reasoning also holds if we replace the word "Santa" with the word "God"? Why or why not?