--%>

Would inflation targeting be a good policy

Question:

Why might it be difficult for the Fed to formally adopt inflation targeting?  Would inflation targeting be a good policy for the Fed in the present economic environment?

Answer:

The most important part of the inflation targeting debate is about the optimal level of inflation. While many people believe that it should be in the range of 2%, it is difficult to ascertain the actual optimal level. Again, if the rate is fixed to 2%, then the Fed will have limited scope for a cut back in the interest rates, which might be required periodically to boost investment. Another case in point is that empirical evidence has suggested that US has experienced lowest level of unemployment when the inflation rate was in the range of 3-5%. Another problem is that the inflation targeting itself might not be efficient, asset price and hence the asset market control will also become important if the goals of inflation targeting are to be realized. In the present economic scenario, when the economy needs stimulus, and investment levels are quite low with high level of unemployment, inflation targeting does not seem to be a good policy measure. There is a need for an increase in the aggregate demand, which if materializes, will lead to an increase in inflation. And if inflation targeting is in place, the interest rates will have to be hiked, which will hamper recovery.

 

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Taxing imports-whats the problem ‘Must

    ‘Must a country which is less proficient at generating all goods use import controls to decrease imports from additional countries?’

  • Q : Public debt How does an internally held

    How does an internally held public debt differ from an externally held public debt?

  • Q : Total revenue when price modify When

    When total revenue to a firm is unaffected by small price modifications, then demand is: (i) Relatively price elastic. (ii) Relatively price inelastic. (iii) Unitarily price elastic. (iv) Vertical. (v) Horizontal. Can someone help

  • Q : Implications of fiscal deficit

    Implications of fiscal deficit: (A) High fiscal deficit entails a big amount of borrowings in which the government takes more loans to pay back it. It raises the liability of government.

    Q : Backward shifting of incidence tax When

    When firms bear the legal incidence of a tax, this is backward shifted while: (1) firms burden consumers by raising their prices. (2) the tax burden is borne by workers in the form of lower wages. (3) resource suppliers seek higher factor payments to

  • Q : Are government budget scarcities always

    ‘The country is at present in recession and this has led to worse tax revenue and high expenses. The effect is a huge deficit. The government decides to increase taxes and lower government expenses. Is this an excellent idea?’

  • Q : Problem of Financial Capital for direct

    The direct economic resources a farmer employs to generate avocadoes would not comprise: (I) human capital in form of expertise regarding growing avocadoes. (II) fertile land. (III) loans from a bank to finance SUCH year’s crop. (IV) machinery,

  • Q : Meaning of Fiscal policy Meaning of

    Meaning of Fiscal policy:Fiscal policy is the set of decisions and principles of a government regarding the extent of public expenses and mode of financing them. It is about the attempt of g

  • Q : Employment Effect Fiscal policy

    Fiscal policy measures used for achieving full-employment level of output and price include increase in the government expenditure and cut in tax rates. A cut in tax rates eliminates only the adverse effect of high tax rates, whereas an increase in government expendit

  • Q : Goals of Microeconomic Hello guys I

    Hello guys I need your advice. Please advise your view for following economics problems. Microeconomic goals consist of: (w) full employment. (x) efficient allotments of resources. (y) price level stability. (z) ec