--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Worse off and better off condition in economics changes

When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Problem of Slavery and Normative

    Please guys help me to solve the problem of Slavery and Normative Economics that is given below: Slavery like a mechanism for allocating labor previous to the Civil War eventually proved to be in conflict along wit

    		•
  • Q : Existence of scarcity for human survival

    Please help me to solve the problem of scarcity that is given below: Why is Scarcity existed for human: (1) survival requires unlimited resources, (2) needs are enormous relative to the means obtainable to satisfy

    		•
  • Q : Associates facts in Economics of

    Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Scientific Economic work that is given below: Scientific tries to relate facts to produce understanding of how things work are termed as: (w) mathematics. (x) theories or mode

    		•
  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

    		•
  • Q : Better off and worse off condition in

    When an economic change makes ten percent of the population better off and has no consequence on the economic welfare of the other ninety percent, in that case: (w) the community is better off. (x) the community is worse off. (y) community economic welfare does not ch

    		•
  • Q : The closest illustration of a free good

    Which would be the closest illustration of a free good: (1) A can of tuna bought along with food stamps, (2) dead leaves which require raking into fall, (3) water through a drinking fountain at a park, (4) a sample of soap acquired in the mail and (5)

    		•
  • Q : Predictable outcome droughts in market

    The predictable outcome of the 2001 to 2002 droughts within the U.S. farm belt was to: (w) raise the price and quantity of farm goods sold. (x) stimulate exports of U.S. wheat. (y) reduce the supplies, and increase the prices of farm goods. (z) boost demands and price

    		•
  • Q : Explain the problem of Self Interest in

    As per the view of humans as Homo economics, individuals: (w) can simply achieve states of whole satisfaction. (x) must learn to get by along with what they have. (y) want to maximize personal satisfaction by self-interested behavior. (z) have fewer requirements as th

    		•
  • Q : Explaining work in Wealth of Nations In

    In words of Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations had given an explanation of work how: (w) dictatorship is more efficient than democracy. (x) economic processes work in a communistic society. (y) real estate investment is a exact path to

    		•
  • Q : Determine desirable items without

    Desirable items without opportunity costs are termed as: (i) free goods. (ii) economic goods. (iii) capital goods. (iv) financial goods. (v) gifts of nature. Hey friends please give your view for the problem of opportunity

    		•