--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Worse off and better off condition in economics changes

When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Define the positive economics Please

    Please guys help me to solve out this problem that positive economics, which: (w) is accepted like true through all economists. (x) is less technical than normative economics. (y) involves statements which, when false, could be proven false. (z) addre

    		•
  • Q : When is Scarcity a problem become

    Scarcity is a problem for: (w) poor countries merely. (x) individuals only when they are poor. (y) capitalists, but not socialists. (z) all people and countries, rich and poor alike. Can someone explain/help me wit

    		•
  • Q : Does the entire thing have a price in

    Does the entire thing have a price? Are there several things you would not perform regardless of price? (Keep in mind that prices and money is not synonyms; here prices may be nonmonetary.)

    		•
  • Q : Market adjustments within equilibrium

    When the soybean market is originally into equilibrium, on S0D0, raises in the wages of farm workers will cause change(s) to: (w) S1D0.(x) S0D1. (y) S2D2.  (z

    		•
  • Q : Combination of land People who seek

    People who seek gains and bear risks and improbability while they combine land, capital and labor in productive ways is: (i) socialists. (ii) sole proprietors. (iii) professional managers. (iv) entrepreneurs. (v) bureaucratic capitalists.

  • Q : Where is Positive theory inaccurate Can

    Can anybody suggest me the proper description for given problem regarding positive theory in Economics generally. Positive theory which is inaccurate: (w) can be disproved through logic and fact. (x) includes poor

    		•
  • Q : Example of Normative Economics with no

    A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the NO economic reform NO

    NO economic reform could probably: (w) remove scarcity. (x) decrease the average costs of production. (y) abolish equality in income distribution. (z) increase wages for most workers. How can I solve my eco

    		•
  • Q : Weather ruins crop-equilibrium

    When the soybean market is firstly in equilibrium on S0D0 and in that case severe weather ruins much of the crop, then the market moves to: (1) S1D0. (2) S1D2. (3) S2D0<

    		•
  • Q : Requirements of Economic Efficiency

    Economic efficiency needs: (w) distributive, productive and allocative efficiency. (x) engineering and dynamic efficiency. (y) historical and sociological efficiency. (z) chemical and physical efficiency. How can I

    		•