--%>

Worse off and better off condition in economics changes

When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Quantity theory of money David Hume and

    David Hume and John Locke summarized an early version of: (1) the circular flow of income. (2) the permanent income hypothesis. (3) the quantity theory of money. (4) the marginal disutility of poverty. (5) the backward-bending supply

  • Q : Illustrates a case of Scarcity and

    Every decision involves opportunity costs due to the fundamental facts which underpin: (i) limits to human reason. (ii) production technology. (iii) limits to human wants. (iv) demand and supply analysis. (v) scarcity.

    Q : Existence of shortages or surpluses

    Shortages or surpluses exist while: (w) transaction costs are zero. (x) quantity supplied be different from quantity demanded. (y) monopolists enjoy exorbitant profits. (z) supply prices equivalent demand prices. H

  • Q : Illustrate new public housing rent free

    Giving new public housing "rent free" to the poor: (i) makes public housing a free good. (ii) involves no opportunity cost. (iii) is the merely way to shelter the homeless. (iv) only transfers costs from one group to the other. Ple

  • Q : Governmental allocations of goods I

    I have a problem in economics on Governmental allocations of goods. Please help me in determining the accurate answer of the following question. Pure capitalism is least reliable with: (i) Governmental allocations of goods. (ii) Laissez-faire policies

  • Q : Achieving economic welfare For any

    For any given point on the production possibilities (or PPF) curve: (i) More economic welfare is achieved than from any points within the PPF. (ii) Moving to some other output combination should yield enhanced economic welfare. (iii) More of some good can be generated

  • Q : Opportunity costs in alternate activity

    Why is this probably precise to believe that you can believe of nothing better to do along with your time immediately than to study economics?

  • Q : Effect of current investment Can

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. Expanding the current investment associative to current consumption most directly raises an economy’s rate of: (1) Stagnation. (2) Capital absorption. (3) Economic growt

  • Q : Define the positive economics Please

    Please guys help me to solve out this problem that positive economics, which: (w) is accepted like true through all economists. (x) is less technical than normative economics. (y) involves statements which, when false, could be proven false. (z) addre

  • Q : Prohibition in illustrations of

    Illustrations of normative statements would not comprise assertions which: (1) premeditated murderers deserve the death penalty. (2) Leonardo DiCaprio is a terrible actor. (3) AIDS and HIV are transmitted through sexual contact. (4) women must be paid