--%>

Worse off and better off condition in economics changes

When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Major foundations of capitalism Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Major foundations of the capitalism are as: (1) Private property and laissez faire govt. (2) Government enforcement of contracts and equivalent opportunity for all. (3) The ri

  • Q : Combination of land People who seek

    People who seek gains and bear risks and improbability while they combine land, capital and labor in productive ways is: (i) socialists. (ii) sole proprietors. (iii) professional managers. (iv) entrepreneurs. (v) bureaucratic capitalists.

  • Q : Governmental allocations of goods I

    I have a problem in economics on Governmental allocations of goods. Please help me in determining the accurate answer of the following question. Pure capitalism is least reliable with: (i) Governmental allocations of goods. (ii) Laissez-faire policies

  • Q : Explain about the positive technical

    Positive technical statements: (w) need value judgments. (x) should be valid by definition. (y) can be proved and tested or disproved by fact and logic. (z) are the excellent guides in specifying economic policies.

  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

  • Q : Nomadic cultures replacement by

    In words of Adam Smith, overview of human history, that asserted nomadic cultures are inevitably replaced with agricultural communities and which with such change comes: (w) raised education for minors. (x) women’s freedom. (y) more stable food

  • Q : Illustration of Economic Equilibrium

    After drivers shift among traffic lanes to exit by a crowded airport till this seems reasonable to expect all exit lines to be similarly time-consuming, economists exemplify the result like an illustration of economic: (i) Equilibrium. (ii) Balance. (iii) Tradeoffs. (

  • Q : Wealth of nation according to Adam Smith

    Adam Smith asserted that a wealth of nation is not gold, although is as an alternative the: (w) wisdom of its government. (x) goods and resources its people control. (y) new physical territory this conquers. (z) military power this co

  • Q : Why are Land Land, labor, and capital

    Land, labor, and capital are all scarce since: (w) human wants are restricted. (x) less is obtainable than people want. (y) each productive resource needs a monetary return for its use. (z) once employed they cannot be used again.

    Q : Case of unsuccessfulness of goods in

    Consider the several possible goods currently producible within the United States, specified our available technologies and resources. When we produced only cat litter and razor blades, there would be a failure to get: (i) distributive efficiency. (ii) economic equity