--%>

Worse off and better off condition in economics changes

When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : When economists disagree in normative

    Can someone give details with best solution about problem of normative economics... Economists disagree MOST often about regions involving: (i) normative economics, while value judgments are involved. (ii) explanat

  • Q : Wealthy entrepreneurs by perfectly

    Do you agree along with the adage such that "You cannot find rich working for somebody else"? Should successful entrepreneurs serve others to enrich themselves? Can wage earners acquire great wealth without investing? How may you test the accuracy of your answ

  • Q : Explain Economics as the extensive

    Economics can be explained as the extensive study of the effects of: (w) money and why having this is good. (x) production costs and profits. (y) how people attempt to gratify their boundless needs. (z) purchases, acquisitions and mergers.

  • Q : Determine the requirements of

    Within broad economic terms "efficiency" needs: (w) an upward move within the production curve. (x) full employment. (y) it being not possible to make someone better off without creating someone else worse off. (z) producing cars with low gas consumption.

  • Q : Price Specie-Flow Mechanism-early

    The equation ΔMV is equal to ΔPQ while real GDP (which is adjusted for inflation), is fixed is a modern method to distinguish: (w) Adam Smith’s labor theory of value. (x) Francois Quesnay’s circular flow model. (y) Roberto Mich

  • Q : Explain about the capital goods Capital

    Capital goods are: (w) machines, equipment, buildings, and other enhancements to natural resources. (x) goods which indirectly contribute to human satisfaction. (y) resources which have been changed for use in the production of other goods. (z) All of

  • Q : Consequence of the increased

    People would be least probable to be happier like a consequence of the increased accessibility of: (1) free goods. (2) economic resources. (3) superior technologies. (4) economic goods. (5) economic bads. Hello guys I want your adv

  • Q : Explains economic problem posed for

    The chorus of a Rolling Stones' song begins along with a line that is, "You can't always acquire what you wish for," that broadly explains the economic problem posed by which factor: (v) scarcity, (w) opportunity costs (x) human greed (y) diminishing returns and (z) marginal utility? How

  • Q : What would be contained in fundamental

    Fundamental economic questions consist of: (w) what, for whom and how. (x) where, how and when. (y) when, how and what. (z) how many, how much and what color,. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem o

  • Q : Society based on pure capitalism Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In a society, based on pure capitalism, the government: (i) Is completely needless, as anarchy is ideal. (ii) Specifies the production and distribution plans in detail. (iii) Enforces the prop