Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
From books of Aggarwal Bors, following information has been extracted: Rs. Sales 2,40,000 Variable costs 1,44,000 Fixed costs 26,000 Profit before tax 70,000 Rate of tax 40% Firm is proposing to buy the new plant that could generate extra annual profit of Rs. 10,000. The fixed cost of new plant is e
Explain identical distributions required or not in the central limit theorem.
Explain sunk cost and it relevant when evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project? Explain.
Which is the most conservative kind of working capital financing plan a company can implement? What are the main reasons that firms hold cash?
Researchers found that this is very hard to forecast the future exchange rates more precisely than the forward exchange rate or the current spot exchange rate. How would you interpret this?This implies that exchange markets are informationally e
What is Gamma Hedging?
Give an example of dynamic hedging.
What are the risks associated with using a large amount of short-term financing for working capital?
Explain the difference between mortgage bond and a debenture?
Normal 0 false false
18,76,764
1925855 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1461330
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!