Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
What are the Most Useful Performance Measures?
How is estimate of volatility or the implied volatility used?
What are the advantages of “collecting early” and how do companies try to do this?
How is marking to market straightforward?
What will an investment banker do while underwriting a new security issue for a corporation?
What about exotic or over-the-counter (OTC) contracts?
A CD/$ bank trader is at present quoting a small figure bid-ask of 35-40, while the rest of the market is trading at CD1.3436-CD1.3441. What is implied regarding the trader's beliefs by his prices?The trader have to think the Canadian dollar wi
How is a portfolio optimized for the greatest expected return in a prescribed risk level?
Explain in brief the accumulated depreciation?
Mr. Ross Perot, a former Presidential candidate of the Reform Party, that is a third political party in the United States, had objected strongly to the creation of the North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA), that nonetheless was inaugurated in the year of 1994
18,76,764
1944218 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1416861
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!