Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
What is Grossman–Stiglitz paradox says?
Illustrates Black–Scholes Equation with an example?
Illustrates an example of dispersion trading?
Where is Crash Metrics Applicable?
Normal 0 false false
What are the levels of implied volatility? Answer: Implied volatility levels the playing field so you can compare and contrast option prices across strikes and expir
Why is Crash Metrics good risk tool?
Illustrates an example of Monte Carlo Simulation?
How can a financial manager decide whether to accept or to reject proposed capital budgeting projects for a given MCC and IOS?
Compare and contrast mutual and stockholder-owned savings and loan associations.
18,76,764
1929701 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1421844
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!