Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
Suppose spot Swiss franc is $0.7000 and the six-month forward rate is $0.6950. Estimate the minimum price which a six-month American put option along with a striking price of $0.6800 must sell for in a rational market? Suppose the annualized six-month Eurodo
Elaborate the statement: Coefficient of variation is a better risk calculator to use than the standard deviation when estimating the risk of capital budgeting projects.
Explain the reasons why all apparent arbitrage opportunities cannot be exploited.
What is Vega Hedging?
How can financial managers estimate the average tax rate?
Explain the important properties of Brownian motion.
What are the benefits of the (just-in-time) JIT inventory control system?
Who said, merger doesn’t create more risk?
What are the difficulties GARCH contained?
Explain identical distributions required or not in the central limit theorem.
18,76,764
1923326 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1445586
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!