Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
Define an example to Hedge?
The risk-averse investor will pay off for risk when he will take on an investment project. Explain
How is gamma measure the rehedged position?
Explain the term number of dimensions in finite-difference methods.
Illustrates an example of complete and incomplete markets?
Where can we get incomplete markets?
Explain why we measure a project’s risk as the change in the CV.
Explain asymptotic analysis in interest rate model.
A stock whose value is now $44.75 is growing on average by 15 percent per annum. Its volatility is 22 percent. The interest rate is 4 percent. You need to value a call option along with a strike of $45, expiring in two months’ time. So, what can you do?
18,76,764
1924862 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1419629
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!