Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
Which is the most conservative kind of working capital financing plan a company can implement? What are the main reasons that firms hold cash?
What is volatility in finance?
Explain marked to market by using the implied volatility.
Hebner Housing Corporation consist of forecast the given numbers for the upcoming year as follows: • Net income = 180,000. • Sales = $1,000,000. &b
What is mathematical definition of risk in form of semi-variance?
Boeing Company is expecting to have EBIT next year of $10 million, with a standard deviation of $5 million. Boeing has $40 million in bonds with coupon of 8%, selling at par, which are being retired at the rate of $3 million annually. Boeing also has 200,000 shares of preferred stock, which pays ann
Give an example of worst-case scenarios and uncertainty?
What is the meaning of “U.S. dollar weakens in the foreign exchange market”?
Illustrates an example of measure of risk aversion?
Explain marking to market will put some rationality back in trading.
18,76,764
1946206 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1448507
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!