Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
From books of Aggarwal Bors, following information has been extracted: Rs. Sales 2,40,000 Variable costs 1,44,000 Fixed costs 26,000 Profit before tax 70,000 Rate of tax
Good fellow national bank decided to compete with a savings and loan by offering 30 year fixed rate mortgage loans at 8% annual interest. It plans to obtain the money got the loans by selling one year 6% CD to it's depositors. During first year of operation, good fellows sold it's depositors 1,000,0
What are distinction variables and parameters of Vega Hedging?
What are those factors that common stockholders would consider while deciding how much cash dividends they want from corporation in which they have invested?
What is Margin Hedging?
Normal 0 false false
Why is the money given time value?
Why would it be useful to inspect a country's balance of payments data?It would be useful to inspect a country's BOP for at least two reasons. Firstly, BOP provides detailed information regarding the supply & demand of the country's currency
Who described the criteria which make a risk measure coherent?
What is MCC (marginal cost of capital schedule)? The schedule is always a horizontal line. Elaborate.
18,76,764
1942973 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1419597
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!