Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
What is jump-diffusion model?
How is quantity of model risk dependency on vega hedge?
How is risk and return related to the market as a whole? Give an example.
Explain an example of Brownian motion effects.
What are the characteristics of calibration?
Explain the term CGARCH as of the GARCH’s family.
Where is Crash Metrics Used?
Explain Treasury bill and risk involved with it.
How can we approximately calculate expected incremental cash flows for a proposed capital budgeting project?
Explain the modern methodology for calculating tail risk by using Extreme Value Theory.
18,76,764
1954430 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1452369
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!